1.1 Compare and contrast Capco’s culture and structure to Coca-Cola.
1.2 Explain how the relationship between an organization’s structure and culture can impact the performance of the business.
1.3 Impact of individual behavior in the workplace of Coca-cola.
Tas 2. 1
2.1 Effectiveness of leadership styles in the proposed business.
2.2 Impact of organizational theories on management practices in Coca-cola.
2.3 Evaluating the management methods practiced in the proposed business.
3.1 Influence of leadership styles in organizational change.
3.2 Applications of motivational theories within an organizational setting.
3.3 Importance of motivational theories in the proposed business.
4.1 Nature and behavior of group/team behavior in the Coca-Cola Company.
4.2 Factors of building effective teams in the proposed business.
4.3 Impact of technology on tea functioning in the Coca-Cola Company.
Organizational Behavior (OB) is the research of human being behavior in an organizational environment. It is also the study of the interface between the organization and human behavior. There are three sections of organizational behavior. These are: how an organization behaves, works in groups and organizations individuals (David, Buchanan and Huczynski, 2013). The significance of organizational behavior is many. It creates a superior relationship between the employee, organization as well as social motives. It completes human resources wide arrangement, for example, manners, guidance, companies, management changing, education, etc. It improves comparison in an organization. The usage of human resources can be created by organizational behavior. It simplifies inspiration. It conducts upper proficiency (BPP, 2015).
This report focuses on four major tasks. The first task discusses the comparison of the organizational structure and the culture of Coca-Cola and Capco. It also focuses on the relationship between Coca cola’s structure and cultural impacts. It also reports on the factors which influence individual behavior in Coca-cola. The second task emphasizes the comparison of different leadership styles in several companies. It also reports on the several management practices in the two organizations as well as discusses the theory underpins which relate to their management procedures. It also explains the several management styles used in different several companies. The third task discusses several leadership styles that may have on motivation in organizations in periods of change. It also focuses on the comparison of several motivational theories within the workplace. The four tasks discuss the characteristics of groups as well as group behavior within Coca-cola. It also reports on the impact of the technology of team functioning within Coca-cola.
Our Recommended Resources:
1.1 Compare and contrast Capco’s culture and structure to Coca-Cola
According to Porter et al. (2015), organizational structure explains the activities for example supervision, coordination as well as task division are conducted in the direction of organizational performance. It can also be described as the performance through that particular see their companies. Every organization has three organizational forms. Matrix style organizational structure; Tall or hierarchical organizational structure and flat or horizontal organizational structure are the most common three organizational structures.
Hierarchical or tall structure: A hierarchical structure is typically noticed as a pyramid. In a company, the hierarchy is a structure of a singular group of strength at the peak with the following levels of capacity beneath them. The business is arranged in several five sectors. Senior management will be the top of the hierarchical structure layer (Porter et al., 2015).
Diagram: Hierarchical structure Source: Porter et al. (2015)
Horizontal or flat structure: A flat organization has a kind of organizational structure with few or no levels of central administration between employee and manager. There are few people in this layer. Director manages manager, manager supports team leader, team leader examines supervisor. Skilled as well as inspired workers are worked better in the flat structure (Porter et al., 2015).
Diagram: Flat structure Source: Porter et al. (2015)
Matrix structure: A matrix organizational structure is a structure in that the organizational relationships are arranged as a matrix or as a grid. Employees have twofold reporting relationships. They are a functional manager and a product manager. It is one of the most complicated structures. The organization needs some skillful people pulled from many organizational areas of the companies for example finance, human resource, marketing operations (Porter et al., 2015).
Diagram: Matrix structure Source: Porter et al. (2015)
Organizational culture mentions to beliefs, rules as well as shared values, beliefs of a company that support the behavioral forms features to its staff. The major functions of organic culture are people culture, role culture, power culture, task culture (David, Buchanan and Huczynski, 2013).
In this culture, all of the decision-making power is held by a single person or a small number of people. This culture is not suitable for large organizations like Tesco. This is suitable for a small company, where the owner/manager is responsible for making almost all the business decisions (David, Buchanan and Huczynski, 2013).
Diagram: Power culture Source: David, Buchanan, and Huczynski (2013)
Role culture is an administrative structure and thought management structural concept in that all persons are attributed to particular characters. This culture concentrates on infidel roles. The power, responsibility, and authority are distributed to individuals (David, Buchanan and Huczynski, 2013)………………….