Unit 13 and 41 Personal and Professional Development Assignment (GC01835)

Table of Contents

Task A.

1.1 Approaches to Self-managed learning.

1.2 Briefly explain Honey and Mumford’s learning styles.

1.3 My preferred learning style.

Task 2.

2.1 SWOT Analysis.

2.2 Skills Audit

Skills Audit

2.3 Critically evaluate how you may use your key strengths in your current or future job.

Task 3.

3.1 Personal and career plan.

2.2 SMART Objectives.

2.3  Personal development plan.

2.4 Critically reflect my own learning focusing on aims and objectives.

Updating my PDP adding two extra objectives.

Task 4:

4.1 Memo to the manager.

4.2 Email to the customer who complained.

4.3 Recommendation to the management.

Conclusion.

References.

 Task A

1.1 Approaches to Self-managed learning

Self-directed learning gives the opportunity to the student to rise up with their own learning techniques but sometimes students receive a short-term learning process that can help to pass the exam and finish a project. It is significant that students gain knowledge in the long term position.

Seminars and conferences

They can learn by seminars and conferences and make variations for the future. Seminars and conferences accept people presenting their knowledge to other people which finish up learning modern things. People can be helped by conferences with developing presentation skills and comfortable feelings which are needed in the institution.

Internet

Students can learn by searching the internet. Different articles are written by different writers in strategic risk management, leadership studies etc. People gain knowledge that can be transferred to the workstation. Different types of sites which can be searched on the Internet by the students help them a lot. Directgov.co.uk has several pieces of information that people can learn from this website.

Research

By learning through research, it allows people to learn their learning at their own process as well as their own place. In other words, “just in time and just enough.”

1.2 Briefly explain Honey and Mumford learning styles

Learning styles invoke a field of challenging as well as disputed beliefs which ambition to desire for changes in particulars’ knowledge. These beliefs suggest that all humans can be restricted as to their ‘fashion’ of knowledge, even though the different beliefs show distinct aspects on which way the fashions should be classified as well as identified. A ordinary idea is that particulars vary in which way they gain.

The concept of analyzed knowing fashions convert famous in the 1970s as well as has mainly affected discipline against the assessment which the concept has taken from a few investigators. Advocates advise that educators evaluate the knowing fashions of their pupils or comply with their lecture room techniques to good capable of every pupil’s knowing fashion. Even though there is model data that particulars explicit desires for what way they favor to take data, some examines have established any legality in applying knowing fashions. There is data of practical or teaching difficulties connected to charging knowing works to “agree to distinctness in a one-to-one style”. Better composition examines differ the extensive “netting theory” that a pupil will know better if educated in a technique regarded proper for the pupil’s knowing fashion.

There are important opinions of knowing-fashions ways from researchers who have analyzed great parts of analysis. A 2015 peer analyzed magazine achieved: “Knowing fashions beliefs have not looked out. Peter Honey or Alan Mumford suitable Kolb’s practical knowing standard. Firstly, they recalled the steps in the knowing period to deal with knowledge: having knowledge, analyzing the knowledge, combining the knowledge, or devising the coming stages. Secondly, they adjusted these steps to four knowing fashions called: Opponent, Mirror, Logicians, Detective.

These four knowing fashions are affected to be captured desires that are flexible, either at an attitude or through developed chances, rather than being established identity behaviors. Honey as well as Mumford’s Learning Styles Questionnaire (LSQ) is its own improvement machine or varies from Kolb’s Knowing Fashion reserve by appealing controllers to finish a record of task-related behaviors without directly asking managers how they learn. Having completed the self-agreements, controllers are supported to concentrate on strengthening. A MORI analysis instructed by The Campaign for Knowing in 1999 created the Honey or Mumford LSQ to be the most deeply applied method for evaluating refer knowing fashions in the local government factor in the UK.

1.3 My preferred learning style

Task 2

2.1 SWOT Analysis

According to Kotler et al. (2014), SWOT means  Weaknesses, Threats, weaknesses and career Opportunities. I have listed my weaknesses, strengths threats, and opportunities in the following table:

2.2 Skills Audit

Skills Audit

I have charged an analysis on my current as well as coming important intelligence or talents according to pursues. The analysis has been charged grading the intelligence or talents from 1 to 5, where 1 = No present intelligence and talent, 2 = a few knowledge, but not efficiently adequate to apply it, 3 = well-known with as well as capable to apply the awareness and talent, 4 = skilled in the awareness and talent or capable to appearance others how to apply it, and 5 = experienced, with a great amount of talent or inclusive awareness……………

Full Documents Click Download Button

Free – Download Checkout Added to cart