Table of Contents
1.1 Compare and contrast organizational structure and culture.
1.2 Impact of organizational structure and culture on the businesses of Apple and HP.
1.3 Factors that affect individual behavior at the workplace of Apple.
2.1 Compare the effectiveness of different leadership styles in different organizations.
2.2 Explain how organizational theory underpins the practice of management
2.3 Evaluate the different approaches to management used by different organizations.
2.3 The different approaches to management used by Apple and HP.
3.1 Impact different leadership styles on motivation within a period of change.
3.2 Compare the application of different motivational theories within Apple.
3.3 Evaluate the usefulness of a motivation theory for managers.
4.1 Explain the nature of groups and group behavior within organizations.
4.2 Discuss factors that may promote or inhibit the development of effective teamwork in organizations
4.3 Evaluate the impact of technology on team functioning within a given organization.
Organizational behavior can be described as the lesson of the team as well as individual execution and work with an organization. Interior and exterior aspects are two principles of the company’s organizational behavior view. Normally this lesson is used in an effort to build more proficient pursuit associations.
This report emphasizes four main tasks. The first task describes the difference between the organizational structure and the culture of Apple and HP. Further, it emphasizes the connection between Apple’s structure and cultural influence. Again it informs on the factors that impact the separate attitude in Apple. The next task focuses on the difference between various command forms in various companies. Further, it informs on the various legislation exercises in both associations and discusses the principles carefully that involved with their legislation methods. Again it describes the various legislator forms applied in various companies. The third task describes various command forms that may have on inspiration in associations in times of alternative. Further, it emphasizes the difference between various inspirational principles in the job space. The last task describes the features of teams and team attitude with Apple. Further, it informs on the influence of the technology of the team operating with Apple.
1.1 Compare and contrast organizational structure and culture
Organizational structure mentions the common process of task and introducing connection which monitors coordinates, and coaxes workers wherein they do the work simultaneously to achieve associational goals (Huczynski and Buchanan, 2015). The main three organizational structures are matrix, hierarchical, and flat.
Our Recommended Resources:
For the hierarchical organization structure, workers are batched along each worker have an obvious officer. This formation emerges on some factors for example activities, geography, commodity, and many more. This is the prevalent pattern with big associations such as Incorporation, Governments, and embodied faiths are hierarchical associations along with various steps of legislation, ability, or dominance according to Creately (2015).
Diagram: Hierarchical structure Source: Creately (2015)
For the matrix organizational structure, the describing connections are established as a grating, or matrix, rather than in the consecutive hierarchy. According to Creately (2015), it is a kind of associational legislation where the same skilled workers are pooled for job actions, turning in over one legislator to report to.
Diagram: Matrix structure Source: Creately (2015)
This structure is usually received by little companies and being active at the rooting period. Big companies are unable to apply to this model. This model removes lots of medium legislation levels. According to Creately (2015), workers are able to build their deduction swiftly freely……….
Full Documents Click Download Button